GraphQL Over HTTP

Note Stage 2: Draft — this spec is not yet official, but is now a fully formed solution. Drafts may continue to evolve and change, occasionally dramatically, and are not guaranteed to be accepted. Therefore, it is unwise to rely on a draft in a production GraphQL Service.

---

1GraphQL over HTTP

Introduction

This specification details how GraphQL should be served and consumed over HTTP in order to maximize interoperability between clients, servers and tools. This specification does not override or replace the GraphQL specification; it extends it to cover the topic of serving GraphQL services over HTTP. If any statement or algorithm in this specification appears to conflict with the GraphQL specification, the behavior detailed in the GraphQL specification should be used (and an issue raised).

The GraphQL specification deliberately does not specify the transport layer; however, HTTP is the most common choice when serving GraphQL to remote clients due to its ubiquity.

Copyright notice

Copyright © 2022-present, GraphQL contributors

THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS”. The parties expressly disclaim any warranties (express, implied, or otherwise), including implied warranties of merchantability, non-infringement, fitness for a particular purpose, or title, related to the materials. The entire risk as to implementing or otherwise using the materials is assumed by the implementer and user. IN NO EVENT WILL THE PARTIES BE LIABLE TO ANY OTHER PARTY FOR LOST PROFITS OR ANY FORM OF INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OF ANY CHARACTER FROM ANY CAUSES OF ACTION OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO THIS DELIVERABLE OR ITS GOVERNING AGREEMENT, WHETHER BASED ON BREACH OF CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), OR OTHERWISE, AND WHETHER OR NOT THE OTHER MEMBER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

Conformance

A conforming implementation of GraphQL over HTTP must fulfill all normative requirements. Conformance requirements are described in this document via both descriptive assertions and key words with clearly defined meanings.

The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative portions of this document are to be interpreted as described in IETF RFC 2119. These key words may appear in lowercase and still retain their meaning unless explicitly declared as non-normative.

A conforming implementation of GraphQL over HTTP may provide additional functionality, but must not where explicitly disallowed or would otherwise result in non-conformance.

Non-Normative Portions

All contents of this document are normative except portions explicitly declared as non-normative.

Examples in this document are non-normative, and are presented to aid understanding of introduced concepts and the behavior of normative portions of the specification. Examples are either introduced explicitly in prose (e.g. “for example”) or are set apart in example or counter-example blocks, like this:

Example № 1This is an example of a non-normative example.
Counter Example № 2This is an example of a non-normative counter-example.

Notes in this document are non-normative, and are presented to clarify intent, draw attention to potential edge-cases and pit-falls, and answer common questions that arise during implementation. Notes are either introduced explicitly in prose (e.g. “Note: “) or are set apart in a note block, like this:

Note This is an example of a non-normative note.

2Overview

Though the GraphQL specification is transport agnostic, this GraphQL over HTTP specification aims to map GraphQL’s semantics to their HTTP equivalents, enabling us to combine the full advantages of GraphQL with the rich feature set of HTTP.

GraphQL queries and mutations naturally mirror the request/response message model used in HTTP, allowing us to provide a GraphQL request in an HTTP request and a GraphQL response in an HTTP response.

In this document, the term server refers to a GraphQL over HTTP Specification compliant HTTP server unless the context indicates otherwise.

The role of a server is to provide a client access to one or more GraphQL services over HTTP. A server is not a GraphQL service; it is a GraphQL service host.

In this document, the term client refers to a GraphQL over HTTP Specification compliant HTTP client unless the context indicates otherwise.

The role of a client is to issue HTTP requests to a server in order to interact with a GraphQL service.

Note GraphQL Subscriptions are beyond the scope of this specification at this time.

3HTTP protocol

A server MUST comply with RFC7231 semantics.

A server MUST support at least one version of the HTTP message format, such as HTTP/1.1 or HTTP/2.

A server MAY support several versions of the HTTP message format for wider compatibility.

4URL

A server MUST enable GraphQL requests to one or more GraphQL schemas.

Each GraphQL schema a server provides MUST be served via one or more URLs.

A server MUST NOT require the client to use different URLs for different GraphQL query and mutation requests to the same GraphQL schema.

The GraphQL schema available via a single URL MAY be different for different clients. For example, alpha testers or authenticated users may have access to a schema with additional fields.

A server MAY forbid individual requests by a client to any endpoint for any reason, for example to require authentication or payment; when doing so it SHOULD use the relevant 4xx or 5xx status code. This decision SHOULD NOT be based on the contents of a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request.

Note The server should not make authorization decisions based on any part of the GraphQL request; these decisions should be made by the GraphQL schema during GraphQL’s ExecuteRequest(), allowing for a partial response to be generated.

Server URLs which enable GraphQL requests MAY also be used for other purposes, as long as they don’t conflict with the server’s responsibility to handle GraphQL requests.

It is RECOMMENDED to end the path component of the URL with /graphql, for example:

Example № 3http://example.com/graphql
Example № 4http://product.example.com/graphql
Example № 5http://example.com/product/graphql

5Serialization Format

The GraphQL specification allows for many serialization formats to be implemented. Servers and clients MUST support JSON and MAY support other, additional serialization formats.

5.1Media Types

The following are the officially recognized GraphQL media types:

Name Description
application/json Media type for GraphQL JSON requests
application/graphql-response+json Media type for GraphQL JSON responses

For details of the shapes of these JSON payloads, please see Request and Response.

If the media type in a Content-Type or Accept header does not include encoding information and matches one of the officially recognized GraphQL media types, then utf-8 MUST be assumed (e.g. for header Content-Type: application/graphql-response+json, UTF-8 encoding would be assumed).

6Request

A server MUST accept POST requests, and MAY accept other HTTP methods, such as GET.

6.1Request Parameters

A GraphQL-over-HTTP request is an HTTP request that encodes the following parameters in one of the manners described in this specification:

  • query - (Required, string): The string representation of the Source Text of a GraphQL Document as specified in the Language section of the GraphQL specification.
  • operationName - (Optional, string): The name of the Operation in the Document to execute.
  • variables - (Optional, map): Values for any Variables defined by the Operation.
  • extensions - (Optional, map): This entry is reserved for implementers to extend the protocol however they see fit, as specified in the Response section of the GraphQL specification.

Servers receiving a request with additional parameters MUST ignore parameters they do not understand.

If implementers need to add additional information to a request they MUST do so via other means; the RECOMMENDED approach is to add an implementer-scoped entry to the extensions object.

Note When comparing GraphQL-over-HTTP request against the term “request” in the GraphQL specification you should note the GraphQL schema and “initial value” are not included in the GraphQL-over-HTTP request; they are handled by the server based on the URL used.
Note Be aware that query is a misleading parameter name as its value is a string describing one or more operations, each of which may be a query or mutation. A better name would have been document, but the term query is well established.
Note Depending on the serialization format used, values of the aforementioned parameters can be encoded differently but their names and semantics must stay the same.
Note An HTTP request that encodes parameters of the same names but of the wrong type, or that omits required parameters, is not a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request.
Note So long as it is a string, query does not have to parse or validate to be part of a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request.

6.2Accept

A client MUST indicate the media types that it supports in responses using the Accept HTTP header as specified in RFC7231.

Note If a client does not supply the Accept header then the server may respond with an error, or with any content type it chooses (including serving a valid GraphQL response under a media type of its choosing). To ensure your client gets something useful, it needs to indicate the media types it supports.

The client MUST include the media type application/graphql-response+json in the Accept header.

6.3GET

For HTTP GET requests, the GraphQL-over-HTTP request parameters MUST be provided in the query component of the request URL, encoded in the application/x-www-form-urlencoded format as specified by the WHATWG URLSearchParams class.

The query parameter MUST be the string representation of the source text of the document as specified in the Language section of the GraphQL specification.

The operationName parameter, if present and not the empty string, MUST be a string.

Each of the variables and extensions parameters, if present and not the empty string, MUST be encoded as a JSON string.

The operationName parameter, if present and not the empty string, represents the name of the operation to be executed within the query as a string.

For robustness, specifying the empty string for optional parameters is equivalent to not specifying them at all.

Note In the final URL all of these parameters will appear in the query component of the request URL as URL-encoded values due to the WHATWG URLSearchParams encoding specified above.
Note By the above, operationName=null represents an operation with the name "null" (such as query null { __typename }). If a literal null is desired, either omit operationName or set it to the empty string.

GET requests MUST NOT be used for executing mutation operations. If the values of query and operationName indicate that a mutation operation is to be executed, the server MUST respond with error status code 405 (Method Not Allowed) and halt execution. This restriction is necessary to conform with the long-established semantics of safe methods within HTTP.

6.3.1Example

If we wanted to execute the following GraphQL query:

Example № 6query($id: ID!){user(id:$id){name}}

With the following query variables:

Example № 7{"id":"QVBJcy5ndXJ1"}

This request could be sent via an HTTP GET as follows:

Example № 8http://example.com/graphql?query=query(%24id%3A%20ID!)%7Buser(id%3A%24id)%7Bname%7D%7D&variables=%7B%22id%22%3A%22QVBJcy5ndXJ1%22%7D

6.4POST

A GraphQL POST request instructs the server to perform a query or mutation operation. A GraphQL POST request MUST have a body which contains values of the GraphQL-over-HTTP request parameters encoded in one of the officially recognized GraphQL media types, or another media type supported by the server.

A client MUST indicate the media type of a request body using the Content-Type header as specified in RFC7231.

A server MUST support POST requests encoded with the application/json media type (as indicated by the Content-Type header) encoded with UTF-8.

For POST requests using an officially recognized GraphQL Content-Type without indicating an encoding, the server MUST assume the encoding is utf-8.

If the client does not supply a Content-Type header with a POST request, the server SHOULD reject the request using the appropriate 4xx status code.

Note Rejecting such requests encourages clients to supply a Content-Type header with every POST request. A server has the option to assume any media type they wish when none is supplied, with the understanding that parsing the request may fail.

A server MAY support POST requests encoded with and/or accepting other media types or encodings.

If a client does not know the media types the server supports then it SHOULD encode the request body in JSON (i.e. with Content-Type: application/json).

Note Request encoding with media type application/json is supported by every compliant server.

A GraphQL-over-HTTP request is encoded as a JSON object (map), with the properties specified by the GraphQL-over-HTTP request:

For robustness, specifying null for optional request parameters is equivalent to not specifying them at all.

6.4.1Example

If we wanted to execute the following GraphQL query:

Example № 9query ($id: ID!) {
  user(id: $id) {
    name
  }
}

With the following query variables:

Example № 10{
  "id": "QVBJcy5ndXJ1"
}

This request could be sent via an HTTP POST to the relevant URL using the JSON encoding with the headers:

Example № 11Content-Type: application/json
Accept: application/graphql-response+json

And the body:

Example № 12{
  "query": "query ($id: ID!) {\n  user(id: $id) {\n    name\n  }\n}",
  "variables": {
    "id": "QVBJcy5ndXJ1"
  }
}

7Response

When a server receives a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request, it must return a well‐formed GraphQL response. The server’s response describes the result of validating and executing the requested operation if successful, and describes any errors encountered during the request.

A server must comply with RFC7231.

7.1Body

The body of the server’s response MUST follow the requirements for a GraphQL response, encoded directly in the chosen media type.

A server MUST indicate the media type of the response with a Content-Type header, and SHOULD indicate the encoding (e.g. application/graphql-response+json; charset=utf-8).

If an Accept header is provided, the server MUST respect the given Accept header and attempt to encode the response in the highest priority media type listed that is supported by the server.

In alignment with the HTTP 1.1 Accept specification, when a client does not include at least one supported media type in the Accept HTTP header, the server MUST either:

  1. Respond with a 406 Not Acceptable status code and stop processing the request (RECOMMENDED); OR
  2. Disregard the Accept header and respond with the server’s choice of media type (NOT RECOMMENDED).
Note It is unlikely that a client can process a response that does not match one of the media types it has requested, hence 406 Not Acceptable being the recommended response. However, the server authors may know better about the specific clients consuming their endpoint, thus both approaches are permitted.

A GraphQL server MUST support responses using the application/graphql-response+json media type.

For maximal compatibility, a server SHOULD support using both the application/json and the application/graphql-response+json media types for responses.

Note See Appendix A for more details about application/json responses.

7.2Validation

Validation of a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request SHOULD apply all the validation rules specified by the GraphQL specification.

The server MAY, at its discretion, apply additional validation rules.

Note Examples of additional validation rules the server may apply include depth limit, complexity limit, etc.

7.3Execution

Execution of a GraphQL-over-HTTP request follows GraphQL’s ExecuteRequest() algorithm.

Note In general, a GraphQL-over-HTTP request that does not pass validation should not be executed; however in certain circumstances, for example persisted operations that were previously known to be valid, the server may attempt execution regardless of validation errors.

7.4Status Codes

In case of errors that completely prevent the generation of a well-formed GraphQL response, the server SHOULD respond with the appropriate status code depending on the concrete error condition, and MUST NOT respond with a 2xx status code.

If the GraphQL response contains the data entry and it is not null, then the server MUST reply with a 2xx status code.

If the GraphQL response contains the data entry and does not contain the errors entry, then the server SHOULD reply with 200 status code.

Note There are no circumstances where the GraphQL specification allows for a response having data as null without errors being present.

If the GraphQL response contains both the data entry (even if it is null) and the errors entry, then the server SHOULD reply with 294 status code.

Note The result of executing a GraphQL operation may contain partial data as well as encountered errors. Errors that happen during execution of the GraphQL operation typically become part of the result, as long as the server is still able to produce a well-formed GraphQL response. For details of why status code 294 is recommended, see Partial success. Using 4xx and 5xx status codes in this situation is not appropriate – since no GraphQL request error has occurred it is seen as a “partial response” or “partial success”.

If the GraphQL response does not contain the data entry then the server MUST reply with a 4xx or 5xx status code as appropriate:

  • If the failure is due to an issue in the request itself, the appropriate 4xx status code should be used:
    • If an unsupported HTTP method is used, status code 405 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the Content-Type of the request is not supported, status code 415 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If none of the media types in the Accept header are supported, status code 406 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the client did not produce a request within the time that the server was prepared to wait, status code 408 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the size of the URI was too large, status code 414 is RECOMMENDED (and the client should consider using POST instead).
    • If the size of the request headers (or any one header) was too large, status code 431 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the size of the POST request body was too large, status code 413 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the JSON body of the request could not be parsed, status code 400 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the request is not a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request, status code 422 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the GraphQL document in the request cannot be parsed, status code 400 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the request does not pass GraphQL validation, status code 422 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the operation to execute cannot be unambiguously determined, status code 422 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the variable values cannot be coerced to match the operation’s variable definitions, status code 422 is RECOMMENDED.
    • If the client is not permitted to issue the GraphQL request then the server SHOULD reply with 401, 403 or similar appropriate status code.
    • If the server is a short and stout ceramic vessel, status code 418 is RECOMMENDED.
  • When the server is the reason for failure, the appropriate 5xx status code should be used; for example, if the server is not able to execute requests at this time due to maintenance or load-shedding then status code 503 is RECOMMENDED.
Note The GraphQL specification indicates that the only situation in which the GraphQL response does not include the data entry is one in which the errors entry is populated.

7.4.1Examples

The following examples provide guidance on how to deal with specific error cases when using the application/graphql-response+json media type to encode the response body:

7.4.1.1JSON parsing failure

For example a POST request body of NONSENSE or {"query": (note: invalid JSON).

Requests that the server cannot interpret should result in status code 400 (Bad Request).

7.4.1.2Invalid parameters

For example a POST request body of {"qeury": "{__typename}"} (note: typo) or {"query": "query Q ($i:Int!) { q(i: $i) }", "variables": [7]} (note: invalid shape for variables).

A request that does not constitute a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request SHOULD result in status code 422 (Unprocessable Content).

7.4.1.3Document parsing failure

For example a POST request body of {"query": "{"}.

Requests where the GraphQL document cannot be parsed should result in status code 400 (Bad Request).

7.4.1.4Document validation failure

If a request fails GraphQL validation, the server SHOULD return a status code of 422 (Unprocessable Content) without proceeding to GraphQL execution.

7.4.1.5Operation cannot be determined

If GetOperation() raises a GraphQL request error, the server SHOULD NOT execute the request and SHOULD return a status code of 422 (Unprocessable Content).

7.4.1.6Variable coercion failure

If CoerceVariableValues() raises a GraphQL request error, the server SHOULD NOT execute the request and SHOULD return a status code of 422 (Unprocessable Content).

7.4.1.7Field errors encountered during execution

If the operation is executed and no GraphQL request error is raised then the server SHOULD respond with a status code of 200 (Okay). This is the case even if a GraphQL field error is raised during GraphQL’s ExecuteQuery() or GraphQL’s ExecuteMutation().

Note The GraphQL specification differentiates field errors from request errors and refers to the situation wherein a GraphQL field error occurs as a partial response; it still indicates successful execution.

8Non-normative notes

This section of the specification is non-normative, even where the words and phrases specified in RFC2119 are used.

8.1Partial success

The result of executing a GraphQL operation may contain partial data as well as encountered errors. Errors that happen during execution of the GraphQL operation typically become part of the result, as long as the server is still able to produce a well-formed GraphQL response.

Using 4xx and 5xx status codes when data is present and non-null is not appropriate; since no GraphQL request error has occurred it is seen as a “partial response” or “partial success”.

There’s currently not an approved official HTTP status code to use for a “partial success”. Contenders include “203 Non-Authoritative information” (which indicates the response has been transformed), “206 Partial Content” (which requires the Range header), and WebDAV’s status code “207 Multi-Status” (which “provides status for multiple independent operations”). None of those quite fit GraphQL’s needs, so we recommend using custom code “294 Partial Success”. Since we are defining the code ourselves, rather than the IETF, we only recommend its usage alongside the application/graphql-response+json media type which makes the meaning explicit.

Note This status code is not to help clients, who should ignore the status code of a response when receiving the application/graphql-response+json media type, but allows servers to indicate partial success such that intermediaries that do not implement this specification may still track the not-fully-successful request (for example, for observability).

8.2Security

This specification focuses solely on the intersection of GraphQL and HTTP. General concerns of either technology, including security concerns, are out of scope, except where their interaction introduces additional considerations.

8.2.1HTTP

Implementers are expected to have a solid understanding of the security implications of exposing a service over HTTP, and are responsible for implementing relevant mitigations and solutions. This specification will not repeat standard HTTP best practices such as not using GET for requests with side effects, safe logging of requests without revealing sensitive information, ensuring all connections are encrypted via HTTPS, placing limits on the length of incoming data, implementing rate limits, authorization and authentication security, request tracing, intrusion detection, and so on.

8.2.2GraphQL

Implementers are further expected to have a solid understanding of the security implications of running a GraphQL service and are responsible for implementing relevant mitigations and solutions there. For example, they may: limit the size and token count of GraphQL documents; ensure document validity; limit the number of errors a response may return; limit information revealed via errors; enforce validation and execution timeouts and pagination limits; implement query depth and complexity limits; implement authentication and authorization; apply rate limits to critical logic; and so on.

8.2.3Exercise caution

Where this specification leaves flexibility for the implementer, the implementer should be very cautious when exercising this freedom. Implementers must make themselves aware of and account for the security implications of their choices; while many alternative choices can be secured, securing them is outside of the scope of this specification.

For example, this specification allows alternative media types to be used to encode the request body; however, media types such as multipart/form-data or application/x-www-form-urlencoded may result in the request being treated by a browser as a “simple request”, which does not require a “preflight”, thereby opening the server up to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF/XSRF) attacks. The recommended application/json media type requires a “preflight” check when issued cross-domain. See CORS protocol in the WHATWG Fetch spec for more details on this.

Note One approach used by the community to mitigate CSRF risks is to ensure a request is not “simple” by requiring a custom header—such as GraphQL-Require-Preflight—is included. The presence of a custom header forces browsers to enact a “preflight” check, thereby adding an additional layer of security. (This is not a standard header, and many alternative headers could serve the same purpose. This is presented merely as an example of a pattern seen in the community.)

Further extending this example, using multipart/form-data may allow large values to be referenced multiple times in a GraphQL operation, potentially causing the GraphQL service to process a much larger GraphQL request than the HTTP request size would suggest.

8.2.4Other resources

For more detailed security considerations, please refer to RFC 7231, RFC 6454, other relevant RFCs, and other resources such as OWASP.

8.3Future compatibility

Supporting formats not described by this specification may have potential conflicts with future versions of this specification as ongoing development aims to standardize and ensure the security and interoperability of GraphQL over HTTP whilst accounting for its growing feature set. For this reason, it is recommended to adhere to the officially recognized formats outlined here.

AAppendix: `application/json` responses

Previous to this specification, the article Serving over HTTP (WayBack Machine entry, 1st June 2022) on the graphql.org website served as guidance.

This article used application/json as media type for the response.

In some cases, the response received by a client may not originate from a GraphQL service, but instead from an intermediary—such as an API gateway, proxy, firewall or other middleware—that does not implement this specification. Such an intermediary might produce the response to indicate an error, returning a response with 4xx or 5xx status code and potentially using the standard application/json media type to encode the reason for the error. Such a response is unlikely to be a valid GraphQL response.

For this reason, a client application receiving an application/json response, could rely on the response being a well-formed GraphQL response only if the status code is 200.

This caused multiple observability issues because it was challenging to distinguish a well-formed GraphQL response from an intermediary response.

application/graphql-response+json allows to distinguish a well-formed GraphQL response from another intermediary response and is the required media type moving forward.

For compatibility reasons, clients and servers may support application/json as described in this section.

Note Servers may wish to only support the application/graphql-response+json media type so that related HTTP tooling may utilize the HTTP status codes of responses without having to be GraphQL-aware.

A.1Accept

To maximize compatibility, a client may include the media type application/json in the Accept header. When doing this, it is recommended that the client set the Accept header to application/graphql-response+json, application/json;q=0.9.

Note The q=0.9 parameter tells content negotiation that application/json should only be used if application/graphql-response+json is not supported.

A.2Status codes

When using the application/json media type, the server should use the 200 status code for every response to a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request, independent of any GraphQL request error or GraphQL field error raised.

If the response uses a non-200 status code then the client must not rely on the body to be a well-formed GraphQL response.

Note A status code in the 4xx or 5xx ranges or status code 203 (and maybe others) could originate from an intermediary; since the client cannot determine if an application/json response with arbitrary status code is a well-formed GraphQL response (because it cannot trust the source) the server must use 200 status code to guarantee to the client that the response has not been generated or modified by an intermediary. See processing a response for more details.

If the GraphQL response contains a non-null data entry then the server must use the 200 status code.

Note This indicates that no GraphQL request error was raised, though one or more GraphQL field error may have been raised this is still a successful execution – see “partial response” in the GraphQL specification.

The server should not use a 4xx or 5xx status code for a response to a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request.

Note For compatibility with legacy servers, this specification allows the use of 4xx or 5xx status codes for a failed well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request where the response uses the application/json media type, but it is strongly discouraged. To use 4xx and 5xx status codes in these situations, please use the application/graphql-response+json media type.

If the URL is not used for other purposes, the server should use a 4xx status code to respond to a request that is not a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request.

Note For compatibility with legacy servers, this specification allows the use of 2xx or 5xx status codes when responding to invalid requests using the application/json media type, but it is strongly discouraged.
Note URLs that enable GraphQL requests may enable other types of requests – see the URL section.

A.2.1Examples

The following examples provide guidance on how to deal with specific error cases when using the application/json media type to encode the response body:

A.2.1.1JSON parsing failure

For example a POST request body of NONSENSE or {"query": (note: invalid JSON).

Requests that the server cannot interpret SHOULD result in status code 400 (Bad Request).

A.2.1.2Invalid parameters

For example a POST request body of {"qeury": "{__typename}"} (note: typo) or {"query": "query Q ($i:Int!) { q(i: $i) }", "variables": [7]} (note: invalid shape for variables).

A request that does not constitute a well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request SHOULD result in status code 400 (Bad Request).

A.2.1.3Document parsing failure

For example a POST request body of {"query": "{"}.

Requests where the GraphQL document cannot be parsed SHOULD result in status code 200 (Okay).

A.2.1.4Document validation failure

If a request fails to pass GraphQL validation, the server SHOULD NOT execute the request and SHOULD return a status code of 200 (Okay).

A.2.1.5Operation cannot be determined

If GetOperation() raises a GraphQL request error, the server SHOULD NOT execute the request and SHOULD return a status code of 200 (Okay).

A.2.1.6Variable coercion failure

If CoerceVariableValues() raises a GraphQL request error, the server SHOULD NOT execute the request and SHOULD return a status code of 200 (Okay).

For example the well-formed GraphQL-over-HTTP request:

{
  "query": "query getItemName($id: ID!) { item(id: $id) { id name } }",
  "variables": { "id": null }
}

would fail variable coercion as the value for id would fail to satisfy the query document’s expectation that id is non-null.

A.2.1.7Field errors encountered during execution

If the operation is executed and no GraphQL request error is raised then the server SHOULD respond with a status code of 200 (Okay). This is the case even if a GraphQL field error is raised during GraphQL’s ExecuteQuery() or GraphQL’s ExecuteMutation().

§Index

  1. client
  2. GraphQL-over-HTTP request
  3. server
  1. 1GraphQL over HTTP
  2. 2Overview
  3. 3HTTP protocol
  4. 4URL
  5. 5Serialization Format
    1. 5.1Media Types
  6. 6Request
    1. 6.1Request Parameters
    2. 6.2Accept
    3. 6.3GET
      1. 6.3.1Example
    4. 6.4POST
      1. 6.4.1Example
  7. 7Response
    1. 7.1Body
    2. 7.2Validation
    3. 7.3Execution
    4. 7.4Status Codes
      1. 7.4.1Examples
        1. 7.4.1.1JSON parsing failure
        2. 7.4.1.2Invalid parameters
        3. 7.4.1.3Document parsing failure
        4. 7.4.1.4Document validation failure
        5. 7.4.1.5Operation cannot be determined
        6. 7.4.1.6Variable coercion failure
        7. 7.4.1.7Field errors encountered during execution
  8. 8Non-normative notes
    1. 8.1Partial success
    2. 8.2Security
      1. 8.2.1HTTP
      2. 8.2.2GraphQL
      3. 8.2.3Exercise caution
      4. 8.2.4Other resources
    3. 8.3Future compatibility
  9. AAppendix: `application/json` responses
    1. A.1Accept
    2. A.2Status codes
      1. A.2.1Examples
        1. A.2.1.1JSON parsing failure
        2. A.2.1.2Invalid parameters
        3. A.2.1.3Document parsing failure
        4. A.2.1.4Document validation failure
        5. A.2.1.5Operation cannot be determined
        6. A.2.1.6Variable coercion failure
        7. A.2.1.7Field errors encountered during execution
  10. §Index